European ccTLDs management

The country codes Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) are two-letter Internet top-level domains (TLDs) specifically designated for a particular country, sovereign state or autonomous territory for use to service their community (more details on ICANN wiki).

The table below shows how ccTLDs are managed in several European countries, including the name and type of the institution that is hosting the ccTLD and if the ICANN multi-stakeholder model is replicated in national TLD management. The table also indicates if the ccTLD is restricted to country nationals and its price.

CountryNational ccTLDHosting institutionType of institution

Multi-stakeholder approach in ccTLD administration

PriceRestricted to country nationals?
Austria.atNic.atCompany, owned by the "Internet Privatstiftung Austria" (IPA) - A foundation under supervision of the "Internet Service Providers Austria" foundation (ISPA)No

For end users: €30 + VAT (20%)

 

Price can be cheaper, if the Domain is registered via an ISP

No
Bulgaria.bgRegister.BGPrivate body (independent limited liability company)No30 EUR + VAT (20%) – for a period of 1 yearNo
Czech Republic.czCZ.NICAn interest association of legal entitiesYes

125 CZK + VAT (21%)

- year
No
France.fr

AFNIC (Association Française pour le Nommage Internet en Coopération)

State-appointed registry / non-profit association / multi-registry operator of the top-level domainsAfnic carries out its assignments in the public interest by involving all the relevant stakeholders in its decisions (scientists, the public authorities, and representatives of private sector involved in the Internet in France).Request is made with a registry office not the AFNIC directly. AFNIC charges the registry offices for a domain name between EUR 4.80 and 5.80.No
Germany.deDeutsches Network Information Center (DENICPrivate (Genossenschaft)DENIC consists of more than 310 members, including almost every  considerable national and international ISP

A domain registered at DENICdirect costs 116 € / year.

However, DENIC recommends to register domains at 3rd party providers (members of DENIC); price is approximately 6-10 € /year.
No
Italy.itRegistro.it (.it Registry) - IIT Istituto di Informatica e Telematica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche  and nic.it/Public body, within the National Research CouncilNoPrice depends on the providerNo, it is open also to people or organizations based in Europe.
Malta.mtNetwork Information Centre (NIC)Public body. Committee formed by the University of Malta. Formally the Malta Internet Foundation.NoEUR 30 (incl. 18% VAT).No
Netherlands.nlDutch registry SIDNPrivateYes

Setup: N/A

Annual: $ 21.19

Update: $ 0.00

Trade: $ 7.06

Transfer: $ 21.19 *

* one-year extension included

No
Romania.roInstitute of Research in Informatics (ICI)Public body (under the supervision of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology).No61 USD + Vat (24%) - unlimited periodNo
Spain.esdominios.esPublic body (under the supervision of Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism)Yes8.09 EUR + (21% VAT – per year)No
Switzerland.ch

The Switch Foundation assigns and manages the domain names under the .ch domain on behalf of OFCOM (from 2003 to end of 2014).

The new Ordinance on Internet Domains (passed by the Federal Council on 5 November 2014) imposing a separation between the functions of registry and registrar (both performed by SWITCH so far) entered into force in January 2015. On 20 March 2015, OFCOM and SWICH renewed their contract for the management of ‘.ch’ until mid-2017, allowing for a gradual transfer of ‘.ch’ holders to other marketers of domain names.

Switch is a foundation created by public sector entities. OFCOM is a government body.No, but OFCOM organizes open multi-stakeholder discussions and is therefore well-informed of the various viewpoints.Depends on the registrar.No.

 

Last updated on 24 October 2016.

Suggestions? Corrections? Additions? Please send us an email at observatory (at) mappingtheinternet (dot) eu. Or suggest via this webform.

Link - Posted on Friday 19 September 2014

« Suggest Internet blocking or filtering following IPRs enforcement measures »